![]() ![]() Note: Prime Photos is for your personal, non-commercial use only. The only problem is this line in their terms of service: One astute peer noticed in my screenshot that the photos didn't seem to count against my new required plan because of my unlimited photo storage offered as a Prime benefit. This was actually happening.įeeling a bit panicked I reached out to a group of trusted photographers asking what they thought about the change, and if they knew of better alternatives. ![]() Well, not too long after that it started hitting the news outlets. How could they do that so soon? They clearly have the room for my photos. At least for that moment, I held on to the idea that I would be fine. I searched online and found zero references to the change in policy. He warned us that Amazon was discontinuing the unlimited plan. Then came a tip from a sharp Fstoppers reader, Rafael. For a very digestible $59 a year I could continue to push photos to the cloud and sort them out "later." I had achieved what I thought was the best possible solution to my storage problems. This did the trick and tackled the last four terabytes in about a week. Screenshot taken in early February 2017.Įventually, after exploring upgrading our Internet to business-class fiber, finding out if Verizon Fios would ever be in our area, and even looking into whether I could get an Amazon Snowball appliance to load the data onto, I sent my entire NAS home with a coworker who had 20 times my upload speed. In this case, the "water" was our household bandwidth and was taking quite a hit due to the clogged up data pipes. There was even the effect of the rest of the water losing pressure. Although I've never done it, I would compare it to filling up a large pond, or even a lake, with a regular garden hose. I would check every morning to make sure it was slowly filling. This meant it would take months for all the photo to get there. I quickly found out that my upload speeds were fairly mediocre. Once I had made the decision to push half a million photos to the cloud, I made sure my Internet service provider didn't have an upload limit. The truly hilarious part is the time and effort I put in to get the photos there, only to have the whole idea poof into smoke via an Amazon press release. Not because you don't want to, but because it takes too much time that you simply don't have. You know, the "later" that never really arrives. If you don't have a solid system to prune your shots and remove fluff on the go, you end up with a monumental task of going through them later. I will be the first to admit we keep way too many photos. I'd imagine the people who were most attracted to the unlimited plan were people that simply could not afford to push their data to the cloud elsewhere. This chart probably looked great on paper, but quickly started straying from projections. There was probably an internal chart showing the expected average user's storage needs versus Amazon's incredible array of cloud storage. I think the idea of unlimited storage is a fallacy. It also advertises unlimited photo storage. Prime Photos is offered as a perk with an Amazon Prime membership. They have also started to promoting and improving their photo-centric offerings. They are so big that when they ran into a problem earlier this year, half the Internet ceased to work. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |